Skip to content
NOWCAST KOCO 10:30pm-11pm Sunday Night
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

These are the states that rank highest and lowest for women’s health in new report

These are the states that rank highest and lowest for women’s health in new report
Hi, more than one in eight voters say abortion is the most important issue to them in the presidential election. Two years since the Dobbs decision, new state restrictions, Supreme court rulings and ballot measures continue to evolve but the headlines can be overwhelming and confusing. So let's stick to the facts about what Americans need to know about abortion access want it. Now, abortion is out the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling on Dobbs V. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which essentially eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion led to an immediate array of bans and restrictions across the United States. Currently 21 states have either *** ban or restriction on abortion, but that wasn't the only outcome in response to trigger laws that took effect almost immediately after the ruling. The Department of Health and Human Services instructed hospitals to comply with the Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act or mal *** the 1986 statute requires doctors to stabilize or treat anyone who comes to *** hospital in an emergency that could include providing an emergency abortion to *** pregnant woman if it would mean saving her life or preventing her further harm. The Biden administration's HHS went on to say that when *** state law prohibits abortion, it does not include an exception for the life of the pregnant person. That state law is preempted Idaho disagreed and its challenge has made it all the way to the US Supreme Court. In April, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Idaho and Moyle, the United States, which questions whether the federal government can pre-empt state law. In the case of abortions counsel, the problem we're having right now is that you're sort of putting preemption on its head. The whole purpose of preemption is to say that if the state passes *** law that violates federal law, the state law is no longer effective. Attorney Josh Turner, arguing on behalf of Idaho said that the state law protects doctors ability to make subjective decisions based on good faith medical judgment. As long as it's within the confines of state policy, including allowing an emergency abortion to save the pregnant person's life. There is *** life saving exception under *** but when justice is asked what if the pregnant person wasn't near death but their health was in peril. Would abortion be allowed just since the point which is they will present with *** serious medical condition that doctors in good faith can't say will present death but will present potential loss of an organ for serious medical complications for the woman. They can't perform those abortions if that hypothetical exists. Idaho law does say that abortions in that case aren't allowed. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prilo further illustrated what was at stake today. Doctors in Idaho and the women in Idaho are in an impossible position if *** woman comes to an emergency room facing *** grave threat to her health, but she isn't yet facing death. Doctors have to delay treatment and allow her condition to materially deteriorate or they're airlifting her out of the state so she can get emergency care that she needs key points of the argument went on to discuss how Idaho would determine if it were possible to stabilize the patient's condition and the health of the quote unborn child. Have you seen abortion statutes that use the phrase unborn child? Doesn't that tell us something under B one, if *** woman goes to hospital with an emergency medical condition, that's the phrase, the hospital must either stabilize the condition or under some circumstances transfer the woman to another facility. The term emergency medical condition is defined to include *** condition that places the health of the woman's unborn child in serious jeopardy. So in that situation, the hospital must stabilize the threat to the unborn child. And it seems that the plain meaning is that the hospital must try to eliminate any immediate threat to the child. But performing an abortion is antithetical to that duty note justice Alito's use of the term unborn child instead of fetus. *** fundamental marker of the pro life movement is to establish fetal personhood. The justices will continue to grapple with this argument until they deliver their decision, which is expected to come down in June. In the meantime, doctors of Idaho's largest medical system, Saint Luke's health have been forced to airlift patients to neighboring states for emergency pregnancy terminations. Six women in three months. This is justice show up here. I love watching in Florida. The questions around abortion access are equally fraught. Just before the US Supreme Court was hearing oral arguments regarding Idaho, the Florida Supreme Court made two major decisions. It allowed Florida's abortion ban to be reduced from 15 weeks to six weeks. *** ruling that not only impacts people in Florida but also delivers *** massive blow to abortion providers in the South. According to the Agency for Health Care Administration, Florida provided more than 84,000 abortions in 2023 including 8000 abortions for patients from neighboring states. Now, patients seeking an abortion after six weeks will have to go as far as North Carolina or Virginia to seek care. Although the law makes exceptions for victims of rape, incest and life threatening conditions. It criminalizes prescribing abortion pills through telehealth or sending pills in the mail. According to the CDC, 60% of abortions in Florida from 2018 to 2023 were medicated abortions. Florida's six week ban went into effect May 1st. However, the Florida Supreme Court also allowed an abortion amendment to be on the ballot in November, Floridians will get the chance to vote for amendment four. If they would like to enshrine abortion protections in the state constitution. The amendment states no law shall prohibit penalize delay or restrict abortion before viability or when necessary to protect the patient's health as determined by the patient's health care provider. As states debate abortion rights in the courts, our understanding of maternal mortality has also changed. *** new study released by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology questions. The maternal mortality rate reported by the CDC in 2021. The US ranks high in maternal mortality rate for *** developed nation. There are 10.4 deaths per 100,000 births and the maternal mortality rate for black women is significantly higher. Black patients are three times more likely to die from pregnancy related deaths. Even though 84% of maternal deaths are preventable. Women's health care and abortion are deeply linked and the impact of the Dobbs decision will likely be felt in the polls. This fall knowledge is power. What you do with it is your choice.
Advertisement
These are the states that rank highest and lowest for women’s health in new report
Women in the United States face a growing number of threats to their health and well-being, a new report says, and there are vast disparities from state to state.In their inaugural state-by-state analysis on women's health, researchers at the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation focused on health issues, collected data on health care quality, outcomes and access for women in the U.S. The data came from several sources, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the researchers evaluated states on 32 specific metrics, scoring them relative to each other.The report, released Thursday, reveals that states in the Northeast scored highest. Massachusetts came out on top as "the best-performing health system for women overall," with Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut and New Hampshire rounding out the top five.The poorest performers were spread across the southern half of the country. Mississippi had the lowest score overall, followed by Texas, Nevada, Oklahoma and Arkansas."This is the very first time we at the Fund have created a scorecard exclusively focused on states' performance in reproductive care and women's health," said Dr. Joseph Betancourt, president of the Commonwealth Fund."While some states undoubtedly are championing women's continued access to vital health and reproductive services, many others are failing to ensure that women can get and afford the health care they need. This failure is having a disproportionate impact on women of color and women with low incomes," he said. "My hope is that policymakers can use these findings to identify and address gaps in care, guaranteeing that all women across the United States can live healthy lives with access to quality, affordable care – no matter where they live or what their background is."'Health of women … is in a perilous place'The new report reveals that life expectancy for U.S. women is the lowest it's been in nearly two decades – since 2006."The health of women in the United States is in a perilous place," the authors wrote, highlighting nationwide increases in deaths from preventable causes, as well as significant state-by-state differences in how many women are dying in reproductive age.In 2022, the mortality rate ranged from about 204 deaths for every 100,000 women of reproductive age in West Virginia to around 71 deaths per 100,000 in Hawaii, the report says."We looked at deaths from all causes among women and girls ages 15 to 44, a common way to identify women of reproductive age, and we found a threefold difference across states, with the highest rates of death concentrated in the Southeastern states," said David Radley, a senior scientist for the Commonwealth Fund's Tracking Health System Performance initiative.Causes of death included those related to pregnancy – with mental health conditions as the most frequently reported cause of preventable pregnancy-related deaths – as well as other preventable causes such as substance use, COVID-19 and treatable chronic health conditions. The report also noted that the maternal death rate nearly doubled between 2018 and 2022, with rates for Black and American Indian and Alaska Native women increasing the most.Deaths from breast and cervical cancer also are considered in the new report as preventable and treatable with timely screening and health care. Breast and cervical cancer deaths were found to be highest in Southern states."We also saw big differences across states in women's ability to access care," Radley said. "The state of health care for women in this country is in a vulnerable place."A fractured landscape of health policies – including Medicaid coverage and access to abortion and reproductive care – contributes to significant state-level inequalities for women across the country, according to the new report."We found big differences across states in a woman's ability to access reproductive health care services, the quality of care she's likely to receive and the outcomes she's likely to experience," Radley said. "We looked at insurance coverage and found that uninsured rates among women ranged from 2.5% to over 20% uninsured, with the highest uninsured rates in states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs."Expanding Medicaid coverage to cover more people with household incomes below a certain level is linked with lower rates of maternal mortality, smaller racial and ethnic disparities in maternal mortality and infant health outcomes, and broader use of reproductive health care services, according to the report. The three states with the lowest maternal mortality rates – Vermont, California and Connecticut – have all expanded Medicaid.Ten states have not expanded Medicaid – Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming – leaving about 800,000 women uninsured. Each of those states, except for Wisconsin, ranked below the average on women's health.Women in states that had not expanded Medicaid eligibility were among those most at risk of lacking insurance coverage, the researchers found. Among women ages 15 to 44, those in Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma had the highest rates of being uninsured. Those in Massachusetts, the District of Columbia and Vermont had the lowest uninsured rates."But access isn't just about having coverage, it's also about being able to get to a service provider when care is needed. It's estimated that over 5 million women already live in a county that's considered a maternity care desert, meaning there's no hospital or birth center offering obstetric care and there are no obstetric providers," Radley said."We looked at the adequacy of the maternity care workforce in each state and found that states with the most restrictive abortion policies also tended to have the fewest maternity care providers," he said. "There's concern among experts that abortion bans and restrictions may reduce the number of maternity care providers even further."'Are those divides … going to continue?'States with abortion restrictions tend to have the fewest maternity care providers, higher rates of maternal mortality and broad disparities in health systems, according to the new report.Fourteen states – Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia – have enacted near-total bans on abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision revoked the federal right to abortion two years ago. All but one of those states ranked below average in the new ranking of women's health from the Commonwealth Fund, and seven were among the poorest-performing states.The policy choices that state lawmakers put forth, including fully expanding Medicaid and imposing abortion restrictions, have "clearly had implications for people in their states," said Sara Collins, senior scholar and vice president for health care coverage and access and tracking health system performance at the Commonwealth Fund."Those are clear policy choices that states are making that are linked to the politics in their state and that are having an impact on women's access to health care," Collins said."Are those divides that we're seeing going to continue into the future?" she asked. "Are there going to be more women who are living in states that don't have full access to reproductive health care? Or are those trends going to reverse? And a lot of that is tied to the politics, both in states but also at the federal level."

Women in the United States face a growing number of threats to their health and well-being, a new report says, and there are vast disparities from state to state.

In their inaugural state-by-state analysis on women's health, researchers at the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation focused on health issues, collected data on health care quality, outcomes and access for women in the U.S. The data came from several sources, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the researchers evaluated states on 32 specific metrics, scoring them relative to each other.

Advertisement

The report, released Thursday, reveals that states in the Northeast scored highest. Massachusetts came out on top as "the best-performing health system for women overall," with Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut and New Hampshire rounding out the top five.

The poorest performers were spread across the southern half of the country. Mississippi had the lowest score overall, followed by Texas, Nevada, Oklahoma and Arkansas.

"This is the very first time we at the Fund have created a scorecard exclusively focused on states' performance in reproductive care and women's health," said Dr. Joseph Betancourt, president of the Commonwealth Fund.

"While some states undoubtedly are championing women's continued access to vital health and reproductive services, many others are failing to ensure that women can get and afford the health care they need. This failure is having a disproportionate impact on women of color and women with low incomes," he said. "My hope is that policymakers can use these findings to identify and address gaps in care, guaranteeing that all women across the United States can live healthy lives with access to quality, affordable care – no matter where they live or what their background is."

'Health of women … is in a perilous place'

The new report reveals that life expectancy for U.S. women is the lowest it's been in nearly two decades – since 2006.

"The health of women in the United States is in a perilous place," the authors wrote, highlighting nationwide increases in deaths from preventable causes, as well as significant state-by-state differences in how many women are dying in reproductive age.

In 2022, the mortality rate ranged from about 204 deaths for every 100,000 women of reproductive age in West Virginia to around 71 deaths per 100,000 in Hawaii, the report says.

"We looked at deaths from all causes among women and girls ages 15 to 44, a common way to identify women of reproductive age, and we found a threefold difference across states, with the highest rates of death concentrated in the Southeastern states," said David Radley, a senior scientist for the Commonwealth Fund's Tracking Health System Performance initiative.

Causes of death included those related to pregnancy – with mental health conditions as the most frequently reported cause of preventable pregnancy-related deaths – as well as other preventable causes such as substance use, COVID-19 and treatable chronic health conditions. The report also noted that the maternal death rate nearly doubled between 2018 and 2022, with rates for Black and American Indian and Alaska Native women increasing the most.

Deaths from breast and cervical cancer also are considered in the new report as preventable and treatable with timely screening and health care. Breast and cervical cancer deaths were found to be highest in Southern states.

"We also saw big differences across states in women's ability to access care," Radley said. "The state of health care for women in this country is in a vulnerable place."

A fractured landscape of health policies – including Medicaid coverage and access to abortion and reproductive care – contributes to significant state-level inequalities for women across the country, according to the new report.

"We found big differences across states in a woman's ability to access reproductive health care services, the quality of care she's likely to receive and the outcomes she's likely to experience," Radley said. "We looked at insurance coverage and found that uninsured rates among women ranged from 2.5% to over 20% uninsured, with the highest uninsured rates in states that have not expanded their Medicaid programs."

Expanding Medicaid coverage to cover more people with household incomes below a certain level is linked with lower rates of maternal mortality, smaller racial and ethnic disparities in maternal mortality and infant health outcomes, and broader use of reproductive health care services, according to the report. The three states with the lowest maternal mortality rates – Vermont, California and Connecticut – have all expanded Medicaid.

Ten states have not expanded Medicaid – Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming – leaving about 800,000 women uninsured. Each of those states, except for Wisconsin, ranked below the average on women's health.

Women in states that had not expanded Medicaid eligibility were among those most at risk of lacking insurance coverage, the researchers found. Among women ages 15 to 44, those in Texas, Georgia and Oklahoma had the highest rates of being uninsured. Those in Massachusetts, the District of Columbia and Vermont had the lowest uninsured rates.

"But access isn't just about having coverage, it's also about being able to get to a service provider when care is needed. It's estimated that over 5 million women already live in a county that's considered a maternity care desert, meaning there's no hospital or birth center offering obstetric care and there are no obstetric providers," Radley said.

"We looked at the adequacy of the maternity care workforce in each state and found that states with the most restrictive abortion policies also tended to have the fewest maternity care providers," he said. "There's concern among experts that abortion bans and restrictions may reduce the number of maternity care providers even further."

'Are those divides … going to continue?'

States with abortion restrictions tend to have the fewest maternity care providers, higher rates of maternal mortality and broad disparities in health systems, according to the new report.

Fourteen states – Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia – have enacted near-total bans on abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision revoked the federal right to abortion two years ago. All but one of those states ranked below average in the new ranking of women's health from the Commonwealth Fund, and seven were among the poorest-performing states.

The policy choices that state lawmakers put forth, including fully expanding Medicaid and imposing abortion restrictions, have "clearly had implications for people in their states," said Sara Collins, senior scholar and vice president for health care coverage and access and tracking health system performance at the Commonwealth Fund.

"Those are clear policy choices that states are making that are linked to the politics in their state and that are having an impact on women's access to health care," Collins said.

"Are those divides that we're seeing going to continue into the future?" she asked. "Are there going to be more women who are living in states that don't have full access to reproductive health care? Or are those trends going to reverse? And a lot of that is tied to the politics, both in states but also at the federal level."