Skip to content
NOWCAST KOCO 10pm-10:30pm Sunday Night
Live Now
Advertisement

Alec Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case dismissed in middle of trial and cannot be filed again

Alec Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case dismissed in middle of trial and cannot be filed again
DISCOVERY TO THE DEFENDANT. THE STATE UNILATERALLY WITHHELD A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. SANTA FE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICER MADE THE DECISION AND APPARENTLY ALSO WITH THE WITH THE PROSECUTOR IS PURSUANT TO HANCOCK’S TESTIMONY THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS OF NO EVIDENTIARY VALUE AND FAILED TO CONNECT THE EVIDENCE TO THE INSTANT CASE. THE AGENT WELL AS PURSUANT TO HANCOCK’S TESTIMONY, MISS MORRISSEY WAS AWARE OF THE NEW EVIDENCE AND YET DID NOT MAKE AN EFFORT TO DISCLOSE IT TO DEFENSE. THE STATE’S WILLFUL WITHHOLDING OF THIS INFORMATION WAS INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE. IF THIS CONDUCT DOES NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL OF BAD FAITH, IT CERTAINLY COMES SO NEAR TO BAD FAITH AS TO SHOW SIGNS OF SCORCHING PREJUDICE. WHEN DISCOVERY HAS BEEN PRODUCED, LATE PREJUDICE DOES NOT ACCRUE UNLESS THE EVIDENCE IS MATERIAL AND THE DISCLOSURE IS SO LATE THAT IT UNDERMINES THE DEFINITION. THE DEFENDANT’S PREPARATION FOR TRIAL. THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT THIS CONDUCT IS HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL TO THE DEFENDANT. THE JURY HAS BEEN SWORN. JEOPARDY HAS ATTACHED, AND THIS DISCLOSURE DURING THE COURSE OF TRIAL IS SO LATE THAT IT UNDERMINES THE DEFENDANT’S PREPARATION FOR TRIAL. THERE IS NO WAY FOR THE COURT TO RIGHT THIS WRONG. LESSER SANCTIONS UNDER HARPER, TRIAL COURTS POSSESS BROAD DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHAT SANCTION TO IMPOSE WHEN A DISCOVERY ORDER IS VIOLATED. STATE VERSUS LA MESA. THE SANCTION OF DISMISSAL IS THE ONLY WARRANTED REMEDY THE JURY HAS BEEN SWORN. JEOPARDY HAS ATTACHED, AND A MISTRIAL WOULD NOT BE BASED UPON MANIFEST NECESSITY. FURTHER, THE SANCTION OF DISMISSAL IS WARRANTED. IN THIS CASE, THE STATE HAS REPEATEDLY MADE REPRESENTATIONS TO DEFENSE AND TO THE COURT THAT THEY WERE COMPLIANT WITH ALL THEIR DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS, DESPITE THEIR REPEATED REPRESENTATIONS, THEY HAVE CONTINUED TO FAIL TO DISCLOSE CRITICAL EVIDENCE TO THE DEFENDANT. BRADY AND HARPER ARE SATISFIED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS WARRANTED. COURT ALSO HAS POWER, INHERENT POWER PER STATE VERSUS LA MESA, WHERE DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS INJECT NEEDLESS DELAY INTO THE PROCEEDINGS. COURTS MAY IMPOSE MEANINGFUL SANCTIONS TO EFFECTUATE THEIR INHERENT POWER AND PROMOTE EFFICIENT JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. THE STATE’S DISCOVERY VIOLATION HAS INJECTED A NEEDLESS, INCURABLE DELAY INTO THE INSTANT JURY TRIAL. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS WARRANTED TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THE EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE. YOUR MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE IS GRANTED. NOW, WITH RESPECT TO THE JURY, I DON’T IMAGINE YOU ALL WANT TO RETURN ON MONDAY. I WILL TAKE CARE OF THE JURY. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. WE ARE IN RECESS. I’M GOING TO. ASK ME SOME JUDGE DISMISSAL. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HELP. STAY WELL. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, GUYS, WE’RE RECESS. ALL RIGHT, GET OUT OF THE COURTROOM. YOU’RE WATCHING LIVE IN THE COURTROOM THERE IN SANTA FE. A VERY EMOTIONAL ALEC BALDWIN IN WHAT IS A STUNNING DECISION BY JUDGE MARY MARLOWE. SOMMER RULING THAT BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO DISCLOSE CRITICAL INFORMATION TO THE DEFENSE, SHE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE CASE AGAINST THE HOLLYWOOD ACTOR RELATED TO THE SHOOTING ON THE RUST MOVIE SET. BALDWIN WAS FACING CHARGES OF INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER. WE HAVE HAD REPORTERS ON THIS CASE ALL WEEK, INCLUDING OUR DOUG FERNANDEZ. WE GO LIVE TO SANTA FE NOW WITH DOUG AND OUR LEGAL EXPERT, JOHN DAY. DOUG. GOOD AFTERNOON. JOHN. AS WE JUST HEARD A SHORT TIME AGO, THE JUDGE SAYING DISMISSAL IS THE ONLY FAIR REMEDY IN THIS CASE. THIS CASE UNRAVELED AT SPECTACULARLY FAST WITH ALLEGATIONS OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, MISCONDUCT BY THE STATE AND ALEC BALDWIN. TONIGHT IS GOING TO BE A MAN UNBURDENED BY THESE CHARGES. IT’S AN INCREDIBLE DEVELOPMENT. I WAS JUST WATCHING ON YOUR PHONE ALONG WITH YOU AS I WAS STANDING BEFORE THE MICROPHONE, YOU SAID ALEC BALDWIN DROPPED HIS HEAD, KIND OF SHOOK HIS HEAD. YOU COULD SEE THE PEOPLE BEHIND HIM KIND OF CELEBRATING AS MUCH AS YOU CAN INSIDE OF A COURTROOM. OBVIOUSLY, RELIEF ON THE BALDWIN SIDE. YEAH, RELIEF ON BALDWIN’S SIDE. AND THIS RAISES SO MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED HERE. WHY DID THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO POURED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS INTO A PROSECUTION OF ALEC BALDWIN, ONLY TO END UP WITH THE JUDGE DISMISSING IT WITHOUT PREJUDICE, MEANING IT CANNOT BE REFILED. GAME OVER. ARE YOU SURPRISED BY THE WITHOUT PREJUDICE ADD ON? NOT AT ALL. THE JUDGE WAS ANGRY AT THE PROSECUTION. THE JUDGE WAS ANGRY AT THE WAY THIS WAS HANDLED. AND IN HER MIND, THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO FIX A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE. AND ONE OF THE LAST PEOPLE ON THE STAND, IF NOT THE LAST PERSON ON THE STAND, WAS CARRIE MORRISSEY. SURPRISED BY THAT MOVE? THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR WAS TRYING TO SALVAGE HER CASE IN CASE THERE’S AN APPEAL, IN CASE SHE WANTS TO GO UP AND SAY THE JUDGE MADE THE WRONG CALL. SHE WAS TESTIFYING ON HER OWN BEHALF. OBVIOUSLY, IT DIDN’T DO ANY GOOD FOR THIS JUDGE, BUT IT JUST HIGHLIGHTS WHAT A PROBLEM THIS WHOLE CASE WAS AND HOW MANY MISTAKES WERE MADE. AND IT RAISES SOME REALLY SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT ALL THE DECISIONS THAT WERE MADE TO PROSECUTE ALEC BALDWIN. OF COURSE, WE ALL WATCHED A LOT OF LEGAL TV SHOWS AND LEGAL MOVIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE CANNOT BE RETRIED. WHAT IF THEY FIND NEW EVIDENCE THAT WAS NOT PRESENTED AT THIS TRIAL? CAN THAT CHANGE ANYTHING OR NO, THIS CASE IS OVER. ALEC BALDWIN CAN GO HOME AND NOT WORRY ABOUT THIS ANYMORE. AND AND IT WAS A LONG HAUL FOR HIM. VERY EXPENSIVE HAUL FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW MEXICO. AND AGAIN, THERE ARE GOING TO BE SO MANY QUESTIONS THAT STILL HAVE TO BE ANSWERED. AND ONE OF THE LAST THINGS THAT WAS STATED UP ON THE STAND OR LINDA JOHNSON, REMIND OUR VIEWERS WHO SHE IS, WHAT ROLE SHE PLAYED IN THE CASE AND WHAT SHE DID TODAY. LINDA JOHNSON VERY WELL RESPECTED FORMER PROSECUTOR, US ATTORNEY, ASSISTANT US ATTORNEY, CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER. SHE APPARENTLY FOR WHATEVER REASON, TOOK HERSELF OFF THIS CASE, THIS MORNING. I THINK YOU CAN PROBABLY PROBABLY HAVE SOME IDEA THAT SHE MAY HAVE HAD SOME SENSE THAT THIS WAS A VERY THIS WAS LIKE BEING ON THE TITANIC WHEN IT WAS SINKING, AND SHE DID NOT WANT TO BE PART OF THAT. SO THE SECOND PROSECUTOR ON THIS CASE RESIGNED, AND WE HAVEN’T HEARD WHY, BUT SHE MAY HAVE SEEN THE WRITING ON THE WALL A LOT OF LA
Advertisement
Alec Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case dismissed in middle of trial and cannot be filed again
A New Mexico judge on Friday brought a sudden and stunning end to the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin, dismissing it in the middle of the actor's trial and saying it cannot be filed again.Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer dismissed the case based on misconduct of police and prosecutors over the withholding of evidence from the defense in the 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film “Rust.”Baldwin cried, hugged his two attorneys, gestured to the front of the court, then turned to hug his crying wife, Hilaria, the mother of seven of his eight children, holding the embrace for 12 seconds. He climbed into an SUV outside the Santa Fe County courthouse without speaking to the media.“The late discovery of this evidence during trial has impeded the effective use of evidence in such a way that it has impacted the fundamental fairness of the proceedings,” Marlowe Sommer said. “If this conduct does not rise to the level of bad faith it certainly comes so near to bad faith to show signs of scorching.”The case-ending evidence, revealed during testimony Thursday, was ammunition that was brought into the sheriff's office in March by a man who said it could be related to Hutchins' killing. Prosecutors said they deemed the ammo unrelated and unimportant, while Baldwin's lawyers alleged they “buried” it and filed a motion to dismiss the case.The judge's decision ends the criminal culpability of the 66-year-old Baldwin after a nearly three-year saga that began when a revolver he was pointing at Hutchins during a rehearsal went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza.“Our goal from the beginning was to seek justice for Halyna Hutchins,” District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies said in a statement. “We are disappointed that the case did not get to the jury.”The career of the “Hunt for Red October” and “30 Rock” star and frequent “Saturday Night Live” host — who has been a household name for more than three decades — had been put into doubt, and he could have gotten 18 months in prison if convicted. It's not clear what opportunities will await him now, but he and his wife signed an agreement for a reality show on their large family in June.Baldwin and other producers still face civil lawsuits from Hutchins' parents and sister, and from crew members. Hutchins' widower and young son had agreed to settle their own lawsuit about a year after the shooting, with the widower becoming an executive producer on the then-unfinished film.But that settlement was reportedly in jeopardy before the trial, and the lawyer who filed it, Brian Panish, now said in a statement that “we look forward to presenting all the evidence to a jury and holding Mr. Baldwin accountable for his actions in the senseless death of Halyna Hutchins.”“Rust,” an independent Western, was completed in Montana. It has not found a distributor or been seen by the public.Prosecutors did get one conviction for Hutchins' death: Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film’s armorer, was sentenced to 18 months in prison on an involuntary manslaughter conviction.She is appealing, and her attorney Jason Bowles said he would file a motion to dismiss his client’s case on the same basis as Baldwin's.Video below: Special prosecutor reacts to judge dismissing Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter caseMarlowe Sommer put a pause on the trial earlier Friday and sent the jury home so she could hear testimony and arguments on the dismissal motion.Troy Teske, a retired police officer and a close friend of Gutierrez-Reed's father Thell Reed, who is a gun coach and armorer on movies, was the person who appeared with the ammunition on the same day the guilty verdict in her case was read.Teske and the ammunition had been known to authorities since a few weeks after the shooting, but they determined it was not relevant.The evidence was collected but crucially was not put into the same file as the rest of the “Rust” case, and it was not presented to Baldwin’s team when they examined ballistics evidence in April.The issue came up during defense questioning of crime scene technician Marissa Poppell, who acknowledged receiving the ammunition, a moment that the judge watched on a police supervisor's body camera Friday.Morrissey argued that the emergence of the evidence was part of an attempt by Reed to shift blame away from his daughter.“This is a wild goose chase that has no evidentiary value whatsoever,” Morrissey said. “This is just a man trying to protect his daughter.”The evidence might not have mattered in Baldwin's case were it included. The charges against him did not allege that he was responsible for the deadly rounds being on set. But the defense's lack of access to it was deemed egregious enough for a dismissal.The trial's other special prosecutor, Erlinda Ocampo Johnson, who delivered the state's opening statement just two days ago, resigned from the case Friday, a move that would have been stunning in itself were it not followed moments later by the dismissal. Baldwin attorney Alex Spiro asked Morrissey whether Johnson quit based on the evidence issues, and Morrissey said she believed it was over the holding of the public hearing itself.Morrissey said she respects the judge’s decision but that there was no reason to believe the undisclosed evidence was related to the movie set.The trial was over after it had barely begun. Prosecutors had only started to make their case, and none of the eyewitnesses from the set had testified yet.Baldwin's younger brother Stephen Baldwin and older sister Elizabeth Keuchler, both actors themselves, sat behind him in the gallery next to his wife each day of the trial, which was streamed live by AP and Court TV. Reporters from both coasts filled the small courtroom and patio outside.The judge dealt a serious blow to the prosecution's case when on the eve of the trial on Monday when she ruled that Baldwin's role as a producer on the film was not relevant and had to be left out.Still, prosecutors forged ahead, painting Baldwin in their openings as a reckless performer who “played make-believe” while flouting basic gun safety rules.Spiro, the defense lawyer, argued that his client did only what actors always do on the “Rust” set and that the necessary safety steps must be taken before a gun reaches a performer's hand.Baldwin was first charged with involuntary manslaughter along with Gutierrez-Reed in January 2023. The charges were dismissed a few months later, but a new team of special prosecutors got a grand jury indictment against the actor this year.The 16 jurors, including alternates, went home Friday thinking they would return Monday for one of the most high-profile trials in state history. They were instead informed by the court that their service had ended.___Dalton reported from Los Angeles.

A New Mexico judge on Friday brought a sudden and stunning end to the involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin, dismissing it in the middle of the actor's trial and saying it cannot be filed again.

Advertisement

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer dismissed the case based on misconduct of police and prosecutors over the withholding of evidence from the defense in the 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film “Rust.”

Baldwin cried, hugged his two attorneys, gestured to the front of the court, then turned to hug his crying wife, Hilaria, the mother of seven of his eight children, holding the embrace for 12 seconds. He climbed into an SUV outside the Santa Fe County courthouse without speaking to the media.

“The late discovery of this evidence during trial has impeded the effective use of evidence in such a way that it has impacted the fundamental fairness of the proceedings,” Marlowe Sommer said. “If this conduct does not rise to the level of bad faith it certainly comes so near to bad faith to show signs of scorching.”

The case-ending evidence, revealed during testimony Thursday, was ammunition that was brought into the sheriff's office in March by a man who said it could be related to Hutchins' killing. Prosecutors said they deemed the ammo unrelated and unimportant, while Baldwin's lawyers alleged they “buried” it and filed a motion to dismiss the case.

The judge's decision ends the criminal culpability of the 66-year-old Baldwin after a nearly three-year saga that began when a revolver he was pointing at Hutchins during a rehearsal went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza.

“Our goal from the beginning was to seek justice for Halyna Hutchins,” District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies said in a statement. “We are disappointed that the case did not get to the jury.”

The career of the “Hunt for Red October” and “30 Rock” star and frequent “Saturday Night Live” host — who has been a household name for more than three decades — had been put into doubt, and he could have gotten 18 months in prison if convicted. It's not clear what opportunities will await him now, but he and his wife signed an agreement for a reality show on their large family in June.

Baldwin and other producers still face civil lawsuits from Hutchins' parents and sister, and from crew members. Hutchins' widower and young son had agreed to settle their own lawsuit about a year after the shooting, with the widower becoming an executive producer on the then-unfinished film.

But that settlement was reportedly in jeopardy before the trial, and the lawyer who filed it, Brian Panish, now said in a statement that “we look forward to presenting all the evidence to a jury and holding Mr. Baldwin accountable for his actions in the senseless death of Halyna Hutchins.”

“Rust,” an independent Western, was completed in Montana. It has not found a distributor or been seen by the public.

Prosecutors did get one conviction for Hutchins' death: Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the film’s armorer, was sentenced to 18 months in prison on an involuntary manslaughter conviction.

She is appealing, and her attorney Jason Bowles said he would file a motion to dismiss his client’s case on the same basis as Baldwin's.

Video below: Special prosecutor reacts to judge dismissing Baldwin's involuntary manslaughter case


Marlowe Sommer put a pause on the trial earlier Friday and sent the jury home so she could hear testimony and arguments on the dismissal motion.

Troy Teske, a retired police officer and a close friend of Gutierrez-Reed's father Thell Reed, who is a gun coach and armorer on movies, was the person who appeared with the ammunition on the same day the guilty verdict in her case was read.

Teske and the ammunition had been known to authorities since a few weeks after the shooting, but they determined it was not relevant.

The evidence was collected but crucially was not put into the same file as the rest of the “Rust” case, and it was not presented to Baldwin’s team when they examined ballistics evidence in April.

The issue came up during defense questioning of crime scene technician Marissa Poppell, who acknowledged receiving the ammunition, a moment that the judge watched on a police supervisor's body camera Friday.

Morrissey argued that the emergence of the evidence was part of an attempt by Reed to shift blame away from his daughter.

“This is a wild goose chase that has no evidentiary value whatsoever,” Morrissey said. “This is just a man trying to protect his daughter.”

The evidence might not have mattered in Baldwin's case were it included. The charges against him did not allege that he was responsible for the deadly rounds being on set. But the defense's lack of access to it was deemed egregious enough for a dismissal.

The trial's other special prosecutor, Erlinda Ocampo Johnson, who delivered the state's opening statement just two days ago, resigned from the case Friday, a move that would have been stunning in itself were it not followed moments later by the dismissal. Baldwin attorney Alex Spiro asked Morrissey whether Johnson quit based on the evidence issues, and Morrissey said she believed it was over the holding of the public hearing itself.

Morrissey said she respects the judge’s decision but that there was no reason to believe the undisclosed evidence was related to the movie set.

The trial was over after it had barely begun. Prosecutors had only started to make their case, and none of the eyewitnesses from the set had testified yet.

Baldwin's younger brother Stephen Baldwin and older sister Elizabeth Keuchler, both actors themselves, sat behind him in the gallery next to his wife each day of the trial, which was streamed live by AP and Court TV. Reporters from both coasts filled the small courtroom and patio outside.

The judge dealt a serious blow to the prosecution's case when on the eve of the trial on Monday when she ruled that Baldwin's role as a producer on the film was not relevant and had to be left out.

Still, prosecutors forged ahead, painting Baldwin in their openings as a reckless performer who “played make-believe” while flouting basic gun safety rules.

Spiro, the defense lawyer, argued that his client did only what actors always do on the “Rust” set and that the necessary safety steps must be taken before a gun reaches a performer's hand.

Baldwin was first charged with involuntary manslaughter along with Gutierrez-Reed in January 2023. The charges were dismissed a few months later, but a new team of special prosecutors got a grand jury indictment against the actor this year.

The 16 jurors, including alternates, went home Friday thinking they would return Monday for one of the most high-profile trials in state history. They were instead informed by the court that their service had ended.

___

Dalton reported from Los Angeles.